Have recoverable websites rebuilt as one coordinated project without treating every domain as an identical job. Our bulk website restoration service supports agencies and authorized multi-site owners working from archived pages, retained files and client-supplied assets.
The Bulk restoration service price is $150 for the scope agreed before ordering, not an unlimited-domain package or a volume-discount promise. Send your domain list for review first. The existing form remains unchanged and does not list this service.
Compare the established restoration packages if you are still choosing a delivery format.
Bulk Website Restoration for Agencies is $150 for the agreed scope. This form lists our other packages and does not include this service. Request a free review before ordering; do not select another package as a substitute.
A batch can include several client sites lost after a hosting problem, older business websites needed for rebuilds, or archived projects an agency has authority to restore. The shared requirement is practical reconstruction: recover usable public material, put it into an agreed delivery format and make the result reviewable. A folder of downloads is not the same deliverable as rebuilt websites.
We scope the work around the actual sites rather than an unlimited-site package. One domain may need clean HTML files; another may require editable WordPress layouts; a third may have too little evidence to proceed. Confirm the included domains and output for each before ordering the $150 service. Do not assume that every submitted site or feature is included.
This service is for commissioning that work. If you are still deciding what should be recovered first, our multiple-website recovery guide covers prioritization without assuming a batch is ready for production.
Start with the sites, their authorized owners and the result you need for each. Include available Wayback Machine links, useful snapshot dates and any retained assets. A concise domain list with clear requirements is more useful than a large collection of unidentified archive files.
Tell us which pages matter most and which constraints are non-negotiable. An agency may need a client’s service pages and historical URLs preserved, while an internal developer needs a static reference before a separate rebuild. The agreed scope should identify those different responsibilities. Do not include passwords or private customer data in a general scope sheet.
Bulk does not have to mean one CMS for every domain. We can discuss a compatible delivery mix and identify where separate work is required. The agreed format determines both how a site will be rebuilt and how your team will maintain it afterward.
Choose HTML restoration for a static-file result that does not require a CMS dashboard. For WordPress, distinguish a retained HTML-based presentation from a visual builder rebuild: Simple WordPress has limited customization and page or layout editing requires HTML/CSS knowledge, while an agreed builder reconstruction provides a different editing workflow.
For agencies needing visual WordPress handover, Elementor restoration can be scoped around editable page layouts. Public catalog reconstruction and operational ecommerce requirements must be separated. The service comparison explains the established choices; your agreed batch scope identifies which output applies to each included domain.
The project agreement should make the relationship between batch-level coordination and individual site delivery clear. Shared requirements can be organized together, but no site’s limitations should disappear inside an overall completion label.
Review the sources and requirements for each site. Identify missing captures, unclear rights, required assets and other dependencies that prevent a reliable commitment.
Agree the domains, pages, delivery formats, acceptance checks and client decisions included in the $150 service before ordering. Confirm delivery timing for that scope, not an assumed per-site production rate.
Where appropriate, use an agreed representative site or page set to confirm presentation, editing and review expectations before extending the work. A materially different site may need its own approach.
Rebuild the supported content in the agreed format. Keep original page relationships, asset sources and unresolved issues attached to the correct domain rather than copying material between client sites.
Compare each website with its accepted scope. Identify delivered destinations, included checks and remaining owner decisions before treating that domain as complete.
A strong archive for one website does not establish coverage for the rest of the batch. Captures may contain different page families, dates and assets, even where the original sites used a similar theme. We assess what is readable and recoverable for each domain before promising its scope.
Public sources can support recovery of visible text, navigation, images and layout references when captured. They do not supply uncaptured pages, private databases, account passwords, orders or customer history. Those items need legitimate retained sources or a separately agreed replacement, not a blanket claim of complete recovery.
Repeated visual elements also need context. A common footer may contain a different office address, company name or legal statement on each client site. Approved shared assets can be reused where appropriate, but unrelated client copy should not be duplicated simply to finish the batch faster. Missing information remains a question for the authorized approver.
Name the person who can approve each client’s facts, design decisions and scope exceptions. An agency can coordinate the project, but restoration should not silently expand into changes the site owner has not authorized. Confirm who will supply current contact details, replacement media and any requirements that cannot be established from archived pages.
Retained page paths and important internal links belong in the rebuild brief. We review continuity requirements within the agreed platform; domain changes, site mergers and redirected destinations are separate decisions. Reconstructing a website does not authorize redirecting a client’s historical URLs into a different site.
Handover should show the agreed result and any remaining responsibilities, including separately scoped integrations or publishing actions. Our agency authorization and handover guide explains those roles. This page does not promise white-label terms, an NDA, account management or an ongoing support agreement that has not been confirmed.
The number of websites matters, but it is not a complete measure of the work. Page volume, archive gaps, media availability, platform choices, layout variety and essential features can change the effort substantially. A batch of small static sites is not equivalent to the same number of content-heavy CMS rebuilds.
The service price is $150. Before ordering, confirm the included domains, pages, delivery formats and acceptance requirements with us. This is not a commitment to unlimited sites or features. No universal bulk discount, minimum quantity, daily output or turnaround is promised. Changes to the domain list require a fresh scope review.
Request an initial review with the domain list and a short explanation of your agency’s role. Note which sites are ready, which depend on a client decision and whether the desired output is already agreed. That gives the review a useful starting point without committing you to the wrong fixed package.
The included domain list must be agreed after reviewing your requirements and before ordering. No universal site count is specified here. The $150 service price is not an unlimited-domain offer or confirmation that every submitted website is included.
Yes, a mixed output can be discussed. Each included domain still needs its own agreed format, page scope and acceptance requirements. A shared service agreement must not obscure different editing needs or restoration limits.
No. The published Bulk service price is $150 for the agreed scope. This page does not promise a percentage saving, an automatic discount or a fixed rate for every domain in any size of batch.
Yes, with the client’s authorization for the requested work and a named person who can approve the result. Domain control alone is not a substitute for permission to reuse someone else’s content or assets.
That domain’s missing sources and options should be identified separately. It may need supplied files, a reduced scope or a different approved rebuild. Strong evidence for another site does not remove that limitation.
No ranking outcome is guaranteed. Recovering useful pages and reviewing historical URLs supports continuity, but search engines decide crawling, indexing and rankings. A restored appearance is not proof of recovered search performance.
Request a review before ordering the $150 Bulk service. The existing form still lists the established packages and has not been expanded for this service. Share the domain list through the enquiry route so the included scope can be agreed. Do not select another package as a substitute.
Send your authorized domain list, available archive sources and the intended output for each site. We will review the scope and identify what is needed before the work can be agreed.